#93- Meshes of the Afternoon

Quick recap: A woman falls asleep, except she’s not. There’s also a key, a flower and a knife that are important for some reason. And also a guy with a mirror face. Basically, what one would expect in a 14 minute art house film.

The phone is off of the hook! How deep! Such meaning!

The phone is off of the hook! How deep! Such meaning!

Fun (?) fact: I’m out on the porch as I type this, and I think I’m about to watch a battle between a wasp and random bird.

My thoughts: If I’m going to be entirely honest, here are my exact thoughts as I watched this film:

Is it a requirement for all experimental films to feature a flower?

Is it a requirement for all experimental films to feature a flower?

 

Gross! Is the symbolism flirting with death, because that's what she's doing putting that nasty key in her mouth.

Gross! Is the symbolism flirting with death, because that’s what she’s doing putting that nasty key in her mouth.

 

That's.....off-putting?

That’s…..off-putting?

 

WTF?

WTF?

 

WTF?

WTF?

 

WTF?

WTF?

 

I could continue, but I think my point has been made. I got that the main character was asleep and I think I understood that she was in a dream but that’s about it. On one hand, I could take the time to analyze the film and research its true meaning, but that kind of ruins the ‘wtf’-ness of it all.

Final review: 2/5. The film was creepy, but overall all the symbolism turned me off.

Up next: My Night at Maude’s

 

#81- Little Caesar

Quick recap: Rico Bandello is in the mob but dreams of becoming the top guy. He and his best friend Joe Massara head to Chicago to stir things up. Rico gets in with a gang and works his way up while his friend Joe decides he would rather just dance. Seriously. Just think of Rico as the Little Engine that Could, only with more guns and wisecracks.

nothing wrong with a little dancing

nothing wrong with a little dancing

Fun (?) fact: Little Caesar was made in the Pre-Code era, which meant that audiences were subjected to lots of violence but still not much sex. When the Hayes code went into effect, movies become ok with the moral crowd but more bland for the rest of us. This is why we can’t have nice things.

My thoughts: Although I had never seen Little Caesar before last night, I already knew who Rico was. When I think of the mob (which I do often), I either think of A) Tony Soprano or B) some 30’s mobster who wears flashy clothing, talks out of the corner of his mouth because of a fat cigar and adds the word ‘see?’ at the end of every sentence. Turns out, that caricature comes from this movie! Yet another pop culture hole filled.

I forgot the pointing at oneself with the thumb! I'm totally going to start doing that more.

I forgot the pointing at oneself with the thumb! I’m totally going to start doing that more.

Typically, the mobster stories I have seen ( just The Sopranos) have been extremely complicated and at times morally ambiguous. Little Caesar is none of that. Rico is a small time gangster who quickly rises to the top with his quick anger and ability to plan successful hold ups. I always thought joining a gang would be more difficult than just, ‘hey, I’m new in town and now I’m going to join up with you guys, see?’ But that’s seemingly what happens. And, unlike The Sopranos, there was never a point in the movie where I felt any emotion or sympathy towards Rico. To an audience member in the 30’s, I can see why that would be a preferable thing. The 20’s were about long, drawn out, epic silent films and once ‘talkies’ were introduced, it must have been nice to sit back for an hour and just watch people shoot each other. There isn’t much analyzing to do here and there are no real surprises.

Mob stories have a reputation for romanticizing crime, but I’m not sure that applies to this movie. Little Caesar was made at the start of the Depression, a time when the rich weren’t seen in the most favorable light. In a way, Rico’s story is more of a moral lesson than anything else: greed will get you nowhere. The mob may be seen as cool now, but I bet that for the average American in 1931, there was something deeply satisfying watching Rico get caught and subsequently gunned down by the police.

Is this the untimely end of Milhouse?

Is this the untimely end of Milhouse?

Final review: 2/5. I’m sad to say that although there were several newspapers shown, none of them were spinning.

Up next: The Tin Drum

 

 

#80- Shane

Quick recap: A tired gunslinger,Shane, comes across a farm owned by Joe Starrett, in need of serious help. He starts working for him and his family and also gets involved in a dispute with Rufus Ryker, a cattle baron, out to take the Starretts’ land.

Shane could shoot, but he was best when posing and looking heroic

Shane could shoot, but he was best when posing and looking heroic

Fun fact: During the scene when Shane and Joe fight, the horses were supposed to act frightened. In order to really build up some hysteria, a couple of guys in bear suits went out and spooked them. That’ll do it.

My thoughts: When it comes down to it, I don’t really have an opinion on Westerns. I haven’t seen many, but, being from Texas, I feel like it is something I should enjoy. The thought of sitting down to watch a Western just seems sort of comforting, like I would imagine old men enjoy doing on a Saturday afternoon.

I don’t know if this is a positive aspect or not, but Shane was exactly what I expected it to be. The scenery was beautiful and there were more than enough grizzled cowboy characters to keep my attention. Before the movie even began, I knew that Shane would be involved in a fight somehow and eventually come out on top. So I guess the lack of surprise made watching the movie all the more comforting. The fight scenes were about as over the top as I expected, including the final showdown. If you want to imagine what the movie looked like, imagine the most stereotypical Western town, complete with the good guy wearing white and the bad guy wearing black. That’s Shane.

I was quite impressed with the menacing grin on Jack Palance's face

I was quite impressed with the menacing grin on Jack Palance’s face

Now, I could easily write the movie off as nothing special and be done with it. But you see, I can’t do that because of the kid in the film. I think the director was going for ‘cute’ and ‘precocious’ when casting Joey, but instead I saw ‘annoying’ and ‘will probably grow up to stalk others’. I don’t know why, but that kid annoyed the hell out of me. His voice was so whiny and he looked like he would’ve fit in with the Children of the Corn. It’s not really his fault, though, because his parents are really to blame. Who lets their child hang out with a random guy that just shows up in your yard one day? Case in point, the final scene when Shane fights Joe to keep him from getting killed by Ryker. Shane eventually wins, but only because he took his gun out and knocked Joe out cold. Joey, the little boy, screams out ‘ I hate you!’ to Shane, which was probably the smartest thing he had said thus far. But then Shane took off to fight Ryker himself and the parents were totally cool with their kid running after him and possibly getting hurt. Then again, maybe they were as tired of him as I was. The iconic final moment where Joey chases after Shane (he does that A LOT) and yells, ‘ Come back, Shane! I love you, Shane,’ made me root for the hero even more. Shane probably rode out into the sunset thinking, ‘thank god I escaped that hot mess’.

He can stare into your soul

He can stare into your soul

Final review: 2/5. Apparently, there is a debate whether Shane dies at the end and left the family so that they wouldn’t see him suffer. Dying would’ve made the movie more interesting, although I still stand by my opinion that he just wanted to escape the clingy kid.

Up next: Little Ceasar

 

#78- The Dead

Quick recap: The story is set in 1904 when a couple of old ladies are throwing a party. The guests all talk about artsy stuff like the opera and who is a good singer and then, after everyone toasts the women on a job well done, everyone leaves. The main couple head to a hotel where the wife reveals she loved a boy before her husband and it’s making her super sad, you guys. In turn, the husband stares out of the window and realizes that he kind of sucks if his wife loves some dead kid more than him. He then says something about everyone dying at some point and then FIN.

how exciting!

how exciting!

Fun (?) fact: One of the first apps I ever downloaded was Solitaire for my iPhone. I’m proud to say that I played my 2000th game during this movie. And by proud, I mean ashamed. And by ashamed, I mean that I really feel no emotion.

on the edge of my seat!

on the edge of my seat!

My thoughts: I don’t think my hopes have ever crashed as hard as when I realized The Dead was not in fact about ghosts, but instead a period drama. Believe me, nothing strikes fear more than ‘period drama’, but I was still hoping that there would at least be some murder or ghostly shenanigans going on. Not in the slightest. In fact, the only drama that occurs in the entire movie happens in the last 7 or so minutes of the film. And that’s only if you consider a woman revealing that she loved someone who later died ‘drama’. Which I don’t, and really, you shouldn’t stoop yourself low enough to consider it either.

I do feel a bit hypocritical harping about how boring this movie is, when I just recently sat through almost 4 hours of a woman cleaning her house. The only action happened at the end of that movie as well, but was much more satisfying. Ever since stopping the practice of reading up on a film before watching it, I could only guess at what was about to change in the couple’s marriage. ( Side note: the Netflix synopsis said that the party was held during Epiphany and that the couple had an epiphany of their own about their marriage. I don’t think I could roll my eyes anymore than I’m doing right now.) There were several times where a woman at the party would wink at Gabriel (the main character) and he spent much of the party secretly pulling out a note and reading it to himself. I thought that he was maybe having an affair with EVERYONE and that would’ve piqued my interest a little, but once again my hopes were dashed when I realized the note he was reading was really a toast he had written for the old woman throwing the party. LAME.

And as for the ending, I do see how sad that would make anyone when realizing their wife of several years prefers a dead kid over them. But is it worth torturing me about for two hours? No. No it is not. I imagine the ‘discovery’ was felt much more deeply from anyone who read the short story by James Joyce, which this movie comes from. I did manage to read up on the short story a bit and it seemed Joyce emphasized Gabriel’s insecurities so that in the final scene, it all comes crashing around him as he wonders whether is it better to die young or old, after you’ve had a chance to mess everything up. That thought seems more profound to me than what the movie portrayed.

jj_the_dead

Final review: 2/5. The Dead wasn’t completely unwatchable. It’s soothing, in the same way listening to rain on my white noise app is. The next time I can’t get it to work, I’ll put on this movie.

Up next: American Beauty