#116- Red River

Quick recap: It’s Mutiny on the Bounty but with cowboys.

and there's a wise cook who shares his teeth with a Native American

and there’s a wise cook who shares his teeth with a Native American. That’s not an expression, by the way. He literally shares his dentures with another person.

Fun (?) fact: John Ireland, who played Cherry Valance, originally had a much bigger part in the movie but due to unprofessionalism barely had any scenes in the final cut.

comparing the size of their 'guns'

comparing the size of their ‘guns’

My thoughts: Despite having hated Shane, I vowed to not let it taint the western movie genre for me. Red River is already a step in the right direction for two reasons: 1) it has John Wayne, whom I have never seen act before (I KNOW) and 2) there are no creepy ‘Village of the Damned’ children. Score!

Before I start, let me first explain that  I was going to make this post all about the flirting going on between Montgomery Clift’s character (Matt) and John Ireland’s character (Cherry Valance). Imagine many witty Gay Cowboy jokes, maybe with a few cleverly placed Brokeback Mountain references for good measure. But in researching Red River, I learned that Clift was most definitely gay in real life and the director (as well as everyone else) was well aware of it. That joke about comparing gun sizes? Totally intentional. And now I’m embarrassed for neglecting my 1940’s gossip magazines, or I would’ve already known this fact. 70 year old scandal is the best kind of scandal, you know.

Red River, for the most part, exceeded my expectations. On the surface, it was a fun western with all the tropes you would expect to see: damsel in distress, negative portrayal of native americans, cowboys being macho and ‘manly’. But I liked how John Wayne’s character brought in some deeper themes. I don’t know much about John Wayne (I KNOW), but I always thought he played the ‘good guy’. Actually, I still don’t really know if he is considered the ‘good guy’ in this movie because he has a fondness for killing people. Like, he just does it without thinking. I laughed out loud in the beginning of the film when there is a time jump to show how much Thomas Dunsan’s (John Wayne) ranch has grown and you can see a whole graveyard of people he has apparently killed and buried over the years. He’s just so nonchalant about it which seems kind of evil, but he always buries the victims and reads out of a Bible so in the eyes of other cowboys, he isn’t so bad.

I also appreciated that the movie didn’t just put the cowboys in situation after situation, even though the cattle drive was perilous. There were dangers, sure, but most of the conflict came between the men themselves. But there was also an ‘indian raid’ and stampede (caused by a cowboy stealing sugar) so the action was plenty intense.

a parting shot of Montgomery Clift and that other guy

a parting shot of Montgomery Clift and that other guy

Final review: 4/5. Close to a 5 but I have hope that there are even better westerns out there for me to see

Up next: Nashville

#80- Shane

Quick recap: A tired gunslinger,Shane, comes across a farm owned by Joe Starrett, in need of serious help. He starts working for him and his family and also gets involved in a dispute with Rufus Ryker, a cattle baron, out to take the Starretts’ land.

Shane could shoot, but he was best when posing and looking heroic

Shane could shoot, but he was best when posing and looking heroic

Fun fact: During the scene when Shane and Joe fight, the horses were supposed to act frightened. In order to really build up some hysteria, a couple of guys in bear suits went out and spooked them. That’ll do it.

My thoughts: When it comes down to it, I don’t really have an opinion on Westerns. I haven’t seen many, but, being from Texas, I feel like it is something I should enjoy. The thought of sitting down to watch a Western just seems sort of comforting, like I would imagine old men enjoy doing on a Saturday afternoon.

I don’t know if this is a positive aspect or not, but Shane was exactly what I expected it to be. The scenery was beautiful and there were more than enough grizzled cowboy characters to keep my attention. Before the movie even began, I knew that Shane would be involved in a fight somehow and eventually come out on top. So I guess the lack of surprise made watching the movie all the more comforting. The fight scenes were about as over the top as I expected, including the final showdown. If you want to imagine what the movie looked like, imagine the most stereotypical Western town, complete with the good guy wearing white and the bad guy wearing black. That’s Shane.

I was quite impressed with the menacing grin on Jack Palance's face

I was quite impressed with the menacing grin on Jack Palance’s face

Now, I could easily write the movie off as nothing special and be done with it. But you see, I can’t do that because of the kid in the film. I think the director was going for ‘cute’ and ‘precocious’ when casting Joey, but instead I saw ‘annoying’ and ‘will probably grow up to stalk others’. I don’t know why, but that kid annoyed the hell out of me. His voice was so whiny and he looked like he would’ve fit in with the Children of the Corn. It’s not really his fault, though, because his parents are really to blame. Who lets their child hang out with a random guy that just shows up in your yard one day? Case in point, the final scene when Shane fights Joe to keep him from getting killed by Ryker. Shane eventually wins, but only because he took his gun out and knocked Joe out cold. Joey, the little boy, screams out ‘ I hate you!’ to Shane, which was probably the smartest thing he had said thus far. But then Shane took off to fight Ryker himself and the parents were totally cool with their kid running after him and possibly getting hurt. Then again, maybe they were as tired of him as I was. The iconic final moment where Joey chases after Shane (he does that A LOT) and yells, ‘ Come back, Shane! I love you, Shane,’ made me root for the hero even more. Shane probably rode out into the sunset thinking, ‘thank god I escaped that hot mess’.

He can stare into your soul

He can stare into your soul

Final review: 2/5. Apparently, there is a debate whether Shane dies at the end and left the family so that they wouldn’t see him suffer. Dying would’ve made the movie more interesting, although I still stand by my opinion that he just wanted to escape the clingy kid.

Up next: Little Ceasar

 

#41- El Topo

405_20120507203651_every_word-2

 

Quick recap: Oh, boy. So there’s this cowboy, called El Topo, who is sort of like God? And he travels around with his naked son as they go around the country killing bad guys. Simple enough, right? But then this girl shows up and El Topo calls her Mara and they do crazy stuff and she convinces him to fight 4 gun masters, as if that won’t end badly. And he does because he wants to keep having sex with her. Being the badass that he is, he indeed conquers all gun masters but does so by trickery and feels guilty about it because he is God. Or something. And then to top it off, Mara runs away with some chick with a man’s voice who shoots him all stigmata style before they run away together. End scene. The second part is even weirder and it involves little people and disabled people and El Topo getting involved in a cultist village and knocking up some girl. My brain exploded at this point.

Fun (?) Trivia: Alejandro Jodorowsky, who played El Topo, cast his young son in the movie to play the naked kid running around in the desert. That’s sort of a messed up thing to do and apparently Jodorowsky felt bad about it at some point and invited the boy to the backyard to dig up a toy and picture of his mother, just like the beginning scene. He then said ‘Now you are 8 and you have permission to be a kid’. Still doesn’t quite make up for your dad showing the world your junk at 6 but it’s something, I suppose.

el_topo

 

 My thoughts: 5 minutes into the film and I think I literally yelled out, ‘WTF!’ as El Topo guides his naked son among the bloody dead villagers. They come across a man who is dying and being the good father that he is, hands the gun to the boy to put the man out of his misery. After that there is some crazy nonsense with the bandits doing all sorts of sadistic stuff to a group of monks and I think at one point I just shrugged my shoulders and told myself to just stop thinking because it wasn’t worth it.

This is the sort of movie that screams, ‘art house’. Jodorowsky is some sort of crazy intellectual guy and put a ton of references to religion into this film of which I caught maybe 10%. It was only after reading the Wikipedia page for this movie that I realized the 4 gun masters represented different Eastern religions. I still don’t know what they are and as I have mentioned, my mind exploded at some point so I don’t care to look it up.

As a whole, El Topo is disturbing. Everything from the nudity to buckets of blood, to the exploitation of the disabled and little people. I knew at some level I was supposed to watch this all the while stroking my fake goatee and taking long puffs of my cigar and every few minutes leaning back and saying, ‘ah,yes. Clever fellow, this Jodorowsky’. But there were too many scenes that I just couldn’t get past. El Topo reeks of pretentiousness, and to find out John Lennon financed its release makes all the more sense.

In order to find some sort of positive in this movie, I will admit that I thought the ending was rather fitting, as El Topo set himself on fire and his son donned the black suit and became the new El Topo. I also liked that last scene because it meant the movie was OVER.

I'm just going to leave this here and let it haunt your dreams.

I’m just going to leave this here and let it haunt your dreams.

 

Final review:  1/5. I understand why this film was included on the list but I’ll be damned if I have to sit through it again.

Up next: Batman

at least he can play a mean flute

at least he can play a mean flute