#142-Close-Up

Quick recap: Close-Up is a semi-documentary about a man who pretended to be famed Iranian director Mohsen Makhmalbaf and was later arrested for it.

Not Mohsen Makhmalbaf

Not Mohsen Makhmalbaf

Fun (?) fact: All people involved in the case play themselves, although many of the scenes are recreated.

Not Mohsen Makhmalbaf

Not Mohsen Makhmalbaf

My thoughts: If you are looking for a documentary with twists and turns, this isn’t it. It’s simply about a man pretending to be someone else. I knew this going into the film but a small piece of me still expected there to be something shocking at the end, like Sabzian murdering everyone or actually being the director Makhmalbaf. It always annoys me when directors take creative license with the truth (*ahem* Foxcatcher) by exaggerating or making up events, but in this case I could’ve handled a bit more suspense.

That’s not to say I didn’t enjoy Close-Up. Being a bit underwhelmed with the case made it possible for me to instead focus on the people involved. As I’m sure the director intended, I felt sorry for Sabzian from the moment he entered the screen. From his story, we learn that he is just a poor man with a minimal wage job who ran with the chance to be seen as a famed director because he wanted respect. His mother is also in the film and she is even more sad than Sabzian. They seemed like good people, even though he was caught up in a case like this. There were many times that the family implied there were ulterior motives to take money and burgle the house, but that doesn’t seem likely. As one of the family members put it, Sabzian was a sick man, the sickness being poverty, and the only way to get better and stop doing illegal things would be to get a decent job and find something to do with his life.

The family’s account of the deception seemed straightforward enough, yet I found it hard to believe that they were really all that hurt by Sabzian. They seemed like decent enough people but there were times, especially when the father became suspicious, that it felt more like they were just being cruel instead of turning him into the authorities. In a couple of the scenes it felt like Sabzian was being mocked, although that could also be because he really wasn’t that good of a fake and gave himself away so easily.

The most powerful part of the film arrives at the end as Sabzian meets up with the director he impersonated. After buying a plant for the Ahankhah family, Makhmalbaf and Sabzian ride to the family’s house where the director becomes the mediator between the two parties. The apology felt real and gave me hope that everything turned out ok.

Not Makhmalbaf

Not Makhmalbaf

Final review: 3/5. An intriguing film about truth but not really something that kept my attention for long.

Up next: Amores Perros

#139- Farewell, My Concubine

Quick recap: This is the story of two men, Douzi and Shitou, whose friendship spans over 50 years in China.

best friends, being bros, doing bro things

best friends, being bros, doing bro things

Fun (?) fact: This is going to be a big one, so be prepared:

Ready?

China banned this movie. I KNOW. Crazy right?!

showing young boys being beaten and tortured was cool for China, but not the homosexual vibes going on between the two characters

showing young boys being beaten and tortured was cool for China, but not the homosexual vibes going on with Douzi

My thoughts: You guys, opera is badass. Seriously. I know next to nothing about it, and what little I do know concerns Italian opera. I think I was aware that China had their own productions but I wasn’t aware how, well, badass it all was. Chinese opera has the same themes as opera around the world: love, death, war, but they have an added element of acrobatics, amazing feats of strength and stunning costumes. Watching Farewell, My Concubine makes me want to hunt down a show and watch it live because although the movie was good, it’s not the same as watching the real thing.

The plot is straightforward enough: two friends stay close for over 50 years. But oh my god, the things these two men went through. I don’t know if you are aware of this, but China has some really messed up history. At times, it felt like the director was going for melodrama, with one tragedy occurring after another, but then again Farewell, My Concubine takes place during a very turbulent time in China’s history. Although this story is fictional, I imagine most of what the movie portrays is something someone lived through at some point.

One thing that really captured my attention was the depth of the characters. Douzi is the main character, whose story starts with his mother abandoning him at the training headquarters for the Peking Opera. He is initially rejected because of an extra finger on his hand, but his mother chopped it off and walked away. The training was brutal, with boys constantly being beaten with swords and expected to be perfect. Douzi is strong, but feminine, and so is trained to perform the Dan (female) roles. Throughout the movie, he maintains his feminine personality, to the point of being overly dramatic, like many people thought homosexuals acted back in 1993. Shitou is the more masculine of the two, but very caring. He has a very short temper but somehow endless patience for Douzi. I really enjoyed not having to pick a protagonist and root for one person because everyone in this film had faults.

the story is that a king is defeated in war. All his soldiers abandon him, except for his horse and concubine. The concubine stands until the very end and then kills herself with his sword.

the story is that a king is defeated in war. All his soldiers abandon him, except for his horse and concubine. The concubine stands until the very end and then kills herself with his sword.

Final review: 5/5. Many of the scenes were very difficult to watch but I was engrossed the entire 3 hours and at the end, it felt like it was almost too short of a film

Up next: Tongues Untied

#133- The Blair Witch Project

Quick recap: Three film students hunt down information about a local Maryland legend, the Blair Witch. While camping in the woods, the hunters soon become the hunted. GET IT?

a scene from one of the scarier parts of the film

a scene from one of the scarier parts of the film

Fun (?) fact: Most of the actors’ lines are improvised. The director gave them very general notes as to what their direction was and then they were in charge of the rest. They were also in charge of filming the whole thing and stayed in character during the entire 8 day shoot.

maybe if Etsy had been around, the Blair Witch might've had something to fill her time rather than killing people.

maybe if Etsy had been around, the Blair Witch might’ve had something with which  to fill her time, rather than killing people.

My thoughts: No sense beating around the bush for this one, The Blair Witch Project scared me half to death.  Which is quite disappointing because this was supposed to be a month long journey of fear and then I go ahead and chicken out after 3 movies. I’m going to continue to watch horror films this month but I’m not sure anything will be able to top the fear I felt after the last scene.

What made The Blair Witch Project so scary for me were all of the times my imagination had to fill in the blanks. There were several scenes where the screen was black and all you could hear wa some rustling and a few voices. Even the final scene when Heather and Mike walk into the house you never see the witch. But what you do see are remnants of what the witch has done: bloody child handprints all along the wall.  The final shot of Mike standing in the corner was almost too much for me to handle. Once again, you never see anything but on the other hand, the nightmare is everywhere. Maybe even your own home. Maybe in your bedroom. Maybe even in the corner with the lamp that came from your son’s room because it creeped him out and now at midnight you finally get it and you want to go in and tell him but then decide against it because that would probably be an example of bad parenting.

What most surprised me about The Blair Witch Project was its authenticity. The beginning of the ‘documentary’ is slow moving with the 3 students packing, goofing off and talking about the cameras. It’s important to have all that in there because the whole idea is that this movie is footage found a year later. It kind of reminds me of my pet peeve with America’s Funniest Home Videos, and believe me, I have MANY. Anyway, my biggest annoyance was the fact that the cameras just happened to be rolling when grandma fell off of the roof or some 4 year old kid was chased by a rabid dog. Were people just sitting there for hours waiting for something to happen or did they just get lucky? Or is it all staged? Why hasn’t Buzzfeed done a ‘where are they now?’ post about the stars from America’s Funniest Home Videos? So many questions now.

RIP 3 acting careers

RIP 3 acting careers

Final review: 4/5

Up next: Horrorfest!

#128- Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse

Quick a recap: This is the ‘making of’ documentary about Apocalypse Now, the movie where everything that could go wrong, did go wrong.

Annex - Brando, Marlon (Apocalypse Now)_12

Fun (?) fact: It’s really difficult to find ‘fun facts’ about a movie that is basically ‘fun facts’. So instead, here is a fact about Francis Ford Coppola: George Lucas has said he based the character Han Solo off of him.

directing Dennis Hopper would probably have driven me to the brink of insanity more so than any other issue the film had

directing Dennis Hopper would probably have driven me to the brink of insanity more so than any other issue the film had

My thoughts: After watching a movie on this list the very first thing I do is head to IMDb and Wikipedia for trivia. Most of the time I’m greeted with subpar information about who might’ve been cast in a lead role or who didn’t get along, but then sometimes I land on a goldmine like Apocalypse Now. I don’t know if I could call it the biggest disaster in movie making, but it was pretty bad: shooting in the Philippines during a civil conflict, a typhoon, Martin Sheen’s near fatal heart attack, going way over budget, everything Marlin Brando…..and the list goes on. The distinction this movie has over other disasters, though,  is that it continued to plug along and what was finally released to the public is one of the best movies ever made.

Which makes me wonder how this documentary would be viewed had Apocalypse Now been a bomb. Part of the joy of watching this was seeing all the chaos and knowing that in the end a masterpiece would be created. I loved watching the process of how it all came together and it gave me more appreciation for the director knowing all the fires that must be put out daily between the actors, production crew and even the setting. At the same time, watching Coppola talk about his plan for how the movie would play out, one has to wonder how anything less than a disaster was to be expected. This isn’t some romantic comedy starring Reese Witherspoon; this is a war movie, with the full war experience and big themes woven all through each scene. Knowing this side of the story makes me love the end result even more.

My drawback to this documentary is a big one: I didn’t find it all that interesting over all. I learned nothing new about how the movie came to be, although I was deeply interested watching Coppola and his methods. I blame the internet for this one more so than the movie. Had I seen Hearts of Darkness in 1995, let’s say, it would’ve been shocking to find out everything that happened. As it stands now, all I have to do is read an article on Wikipedia and I’m good to go. What’s left is a compelling enough story about a director and the lengths that he must go through, but not compelling enough for me to enjoy myself very much.

heartsofdarkness

Final review: 3/5. As a personal preference, I’m not a huge fan of ‘making of’ documentaries to begin with.

Up next: Gimme Shelter